Q. Looking for a monitor good for doing photo editing but not anything completely professional. In researching monitors, many mention the gaming, video, text capabilities but not photo. I just want something that will have good color accuracy so that if I print what I see it's fairly the same thing.
A. Wait, maybe your budget is actually $500? Isn't that what you said, $500?
HP LP2475w (24 inch H-IPS panel, 1920 x 1200), $507,
http://www.provantage.com/hewlett-packard-hp-kd911a8-aba~7CMPK0P6.htm
Pantone Huey color calibrator, $65,
http://www.provantage.com/pantone-meu101~7PANT04J.htm
Reviews,
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/hp_lp2475w.htm
http://www.trustedreviews.com/monitors/review/2009/03/27/HP-LP2475w---24in-H-IPS-Display/p1
HP LP2475w (24 inch H-IPS panel, 1920 x 1200), $507,
http://www.provantage.com/hewlett-packard-hp-kd911a8-aba~7CMPK0P6.htm
Pantone Huey color calibrator, $65,
http://www.provantage.com/pantone-meu101~7PANT04J.htm
Reviews,
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/hp_lp2475w.htm
http://www.trustedreviews.com/monitors/review/2009/03/27/HP-LP2475w---24in-H-IPS-Display/p1
What brand of LCD TV would work best as a computer monitor?
Q. Gonna be building a brand new computer almost specifically for gaming and want to know if anyone has any input with experiences on different TVs. The computer I am currently using is hooked up to a 26" vizio and while its okay I'm looking to go to something in the 40" range since im getting the new comp. Would really appreciate some suggestions and certain specifications that are a must have for this new TV. Thank you in advance!
A. Plasma is the only way to go for gaming. Get a 42" 1080p Plasma by Panasonic, its the smallest they make, with a 15.8 GBps or greater transfer rate HDMI cable. Panasonic bought Pioneer's panel technology when they went out of business. Plasmas don't have that screen burn issue any more either. Plasmas have 0.00001ms or something like that pixel response, and true 600hz refresh rate. (600 pictures per second). Remember, your taking 1,920 pixels by 1,080 pixels and putting them on a screen, the bigger the screen, the bigger the pixels are getting. Stretching the picture, thus giving you a fuzzier image. The rumors that its all about viewing distance, response 5ms response time tv's being adequate, that the human eye cannot detect anything past 60 HZ are reviews from retards. I have tested many tv's, and the differences are HUGE, there is a very noticeable difference between 2ms and 1ms response time monitors. The problem with 240hz and 120hz tv's is its all picture processing and creates a fair amount of input lag and unnatural movement. LCD's are terrible for gaming, no matter what the refresh rate or pixel response time and will ALWAYS suffer from motion blur, very noticeable in first person shooter games, the background will get very distorted whenever you move. If you want a small screen, benefit would be a very sharp picture and less money, get a Samsung 2770FH monitor, its a 27", with a 10.2 GBps transfer rate HDMI cable, and be sure to set the response time setting to fastest. They are a 1ms pixel response time monitor, 60hz which is ps3's native output refresh rate, and the reason pixel response is important is because the lower the response time, the sharper the picture stays. Get internet that is at least 1 mega byte download speed, and always set whatever screen you get to game mode.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar