Sabtu, 03 Mei 2014

Price for LG LCD monitors?

Q. Hi !

Anyone knows the price of 19" an 17" LCD Monitors from LG?

Urgent reply required...

I need price in India and not international

A. 17" LG LCD Dualtone/Full Blk > 9,100
19" LG LCD Dualtone/Full Blk > 10,600

updated 23rd August '2007, ex-Chennai
Delta Computers
Ph.: +91-44- 28521607, 28521572, 28587158, 28547698


I am crying. LCD Monitor in us is half the price of india.?
Q. lcd monitor 22" or 24" costs double in india
i cant use shipping service, its too costly.
any means of getting it at the same price of us ?
:( no friend there. can anyone help in this case ?

A. Buy a CRT monitor. Be happy you guys still have them. The picture quality is better anyway.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Jumat, 02 Mei 2014

Hooking up macbook pro through DVI to LCD monitor?

Q. I hooked up my laptop to my tv and it worked the first time i did it. Since then I have had no luck. The tv does not pick up a signal from my laptop. Anyone know what the solution to my problem is?

A. there is usually a button, or a combination of buttons you can hit to send the signal to the lcd monitor. Google what those buttons are for your mac and that will probably fix it.


Best LCD Monitor for PS3 and Macbook Pro Use?
Q. Hi!
What monitor would be able to run my ps3 at full 1080p (does not need to have speakers) and my macbook pro? I would prefer using an HDMI cable for the ps3 and a dvi cable for the macbook pro. I would need it to be at least 24" and the cheaper, the better.
Thanks!

A. Well, you are going to want a wide-screen monitor. We have been using Dell's LCD monitor family for some time. We've stayed away from their lowest-end models, but have been very pleased with the performance of their mid-stream models. I am on a 24" Dell 2408FWP with a MacBook Pro right now and it works spectacularly with both the native Mac OS as well as running Windows under Parallels.

This particular family has been discontinued, but their replacement line (U2410) is similar in performance and has even more connector types - two DVI inputs, HDMI, DisplayPort, Component and more. Very easy to hook up multiple sources, and if you do want a built-in speaker, the "sound bar" Dell sells attaches to the monitor and is attractive and space-saving (but is NOT what I would call a high-performance speaker system).

Current retail pricing is $599, but they are OFTEN running specials and discounts - and you can always just call Dell directly and ask the sales person to quote you a price that will beat the web price.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Can anyone recommend an inexpensive (under $250) 20 or 22 inch LCD monitor?

Q.

A. Check ZipZoomFly.com, I would avoid ViewSonic lousy customer service, poor quality units, last maybe 8 to 10 moths before defects begin appearing.


best monitor for gaming?
Q. hi what would be the best monitor for gaming under 250? or even a hd tv?
thx! =)

A. Wonderful price range. Here are some for LCD Monitors for awesome prices better than the televisions.

LCD Monitors: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Productcompare.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007617%204018&IsNodeId=1&bop=And&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&CompareItemList=20%7C24-001-388%5E24-001-388-TS%2C24-236-048%5E24-236-048-S01%2C24-236-066%5E24-236-066-TS%2C24-236-049%5E24-236-049-S01%2C24-001-378%5E24-001-378-TS

I was going to include several flat screen televisions but you did not get as good resolution for the price with the televisons so I just left it out. I'd like to see what you'd end up choosing. Glad to help.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tv vs lcd monitor for gaming?

Q. I was recently wondering What is better for gaming and less delay. Ussually delay is not noticed by regular day to day gamers but it is crutial when playing a first person shooter.
I was wondering what a typical response time is for a xbox 360 hooked to a lcd tv vs a game consle hooked up to a lcd computer monitor. I am a hardcore gamer and I want to have the least delay possible.I really want a bigger screen size but I will sacrifice screen size over performance by buying a monitor if necessary. I have heard of the newer tv's with a (game mode) but I am skeptical if it is the m/s response time of a monitor. If anyone can help me ty.

A. I have a big deal for you, Panasonic TC-L32X2 LCD HDTV 32 inches for just $329 or Panasonic TC-L37X2 LCD HDTV 37 inches for just $459 with game mode feature available in both of them the dark images in video games are more clear, besides it offers a wide viewing angle 178° so you can view the full image even if you' re not facing the screen. You'll enjoy playing video games using Panasonic HDTV.
My large experience in TVs lets me tell you do not miss this purchase if you look for gaming TV.
visit my blog to know more about it
http://buy-electronics.blogspot.com/2010/10/panasonic-tc-l32x2-32-inch-720p-lcd.html


LCD or LED pc monitor for gaming?
Q. I plan on getting a 30' monitor which one LCD or LED for gaming?

A. They will both be LCD - that's the display technology that all flatscreen monitors use.
LED or not is to do with the backlighting.

The LED one uses LED lights as the backlight
The non-LED one used a fluorescent light as the backlight.

It is more important to choose one with a good contrast ratio and fast reponse time.
Monitors with slow response times will show a ghosted blurry image in fast moving screen action. Monitors with low contrast ratio will have blacks that are dark grey and colours that look washed out.

Ideally you want a high contrast ratio, a fast response time and LED backlight.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What is the problem with my LCD Monitor?

Q. Now, before answering this question, please bear in mind that..

- I do not wish to buy a new monitor.

- This monitor is/was top of the line, and during at the time of it's release, it was the best in it's series.

- This monitor is my baby, and like I mentioned above, I am NOT buying a new one.

- I do not have the money to buy a new monitor.

Okay, now that we've got that bit of information out there, here's the issue(s)..

As of recently, my monitor will not keep a constant picture.

When turned on, the screen will flicker brighter and darker, only to go completely black after about a second and half.

When this happens, the only way to restore the picture is to turn the monitor off and back on again. Which results in an inconsistent picture(as described above).

Now, please bear in mind that the monitor has power, that the monitor itself is not shutting off. It is only the picture, contents of the desktop, and etc, that I am losing a visual off of.

And no, the issue is not my video card. As I have tested 2 other video cards with this same monitor, as well as 2 alternative monitors with the main video card that I use within my system.

If it helps, the brand of my monitor is Hannspree. The model number is HF257, and it is 24/27 inches in width.

[Please, only serious answers. Thank you.]
Just to note, I have had this monitor for 4 and a half years.
And, ugh.. How much will this likely cost for me to get it fixed ?

A. LCD monitors have a back light to display the picture. This back light is a florescent bulb, or lamp. Just like any other lamp, they eventually die. Your symptoms sound like the lamp or the inverter (the device that powers the lamp) is dying.

You cannot fix this unless you want to dive into the monitor's innards. Your only alternative is to replace it or get it repaired. And this will cost more than the monitor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost? Guaranteed more than the cost of a new monitor. I cannot give you a price because of the availability of parts, labor costs in your area, and such. But it WILL be more than a new monitor.


Best Gaming Monitor????
Q. Hi, I am looking for the best gaming monitor i can possibly find. Something like the pros use lol. i want one with the lowest possible ms lag. Price isnt really a problem Thanks everyone.
also i am a console gamer....
and 1080p

A. ASUS VE278H Black 27" 2ms (GTG) HDMI Widescreen LED Backlight LCD Monitor ($279.99 @ Newegg)

AOC e2752Vh Glossy Black Bezel 27" 2ms HDMI Widescreen LED Backlight LCD Monitor ($229.99 @ Newegg)

Both are best, but the choice is ultimately yours!

Hope it helped,
Good Luck!





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Kamis, 01 Mei 2014

What is the standard warranty for LCD Monitors of Dell UK ?

Q. I bought it from PCWorld UK, dont know if the manufacturer warranty is valid ?

A. If you bought it retail, then unless you purchased an extended warranty - you get the legally mandated 1 year warranty from the date of purchase.

If you purchased it using a credit card (instead of a debit card) check with your credit card provider to see if they give you extended warranties.


What would be better LCD monitor ASUS VW192T+ or Acer X203Wbd?
Q. I was about to buy the Acer model but then i came acros the Asus VW192T. What do you guys think. They both run at the same native resolution even though one is a 20 inch and the other is a 19 inch. My video card (Geforce 7600GT) can handle the resolution so i'm not worried about that. Have any of you had any experiance with these two monitors and which would you recommend?

thanks

A. Both brands are good. Then have been in the market for a long time now and they bring good quality. My brother has ASUS lcd monitor and he is delighted with it. I've searched for Acer X203Wbd and saw good feedbacks also. Though I'm not using this 2 they are good quality. I'm using Dell E1909W 19-Inch Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor - Arctic Silver. It's like this http://onsalenow.org.uk/?p=s&sch=details&store=61&prod=97843. But I wish I came accross with this Dell flat screen first http://onsalenow.org.uk/?p=s&sch=details&store=61&prod=121500 coz' I love it to be wall mounted. But all in all the graphic resolution is great and no problems encountered.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Question about Mac Powerbook and Dell LCD monitors...?

Q. I have a Mac Powerbook G4 and I want to get a Dell LCD monitor (model E207WFP). If I want to run dual screen (meaning using the internal screen and lcd as one bog screen) do I need an adapter or is it just plug and play? I called Dell but the customer service rep didn't know what I was talking about but that's not a big surprise!

A. That monitor has both VGA and DVI. You powerbook has a DVI output. As long as the monitor comes with the DVI cable, you just plug and play. If the monitor comes with a VGA cable, the powerbook when bought came with a DVI to VGA adapter. You should not need anything.


Looking for customer reviews for Dell 3007WFP-HC 30-Inch LCD Widescreen Monitor?
Q. Where can I find reviews and opinions online for Dell 3007WFP-HC 30-Inch LCD Widescreen Monitor

A. Customer Reviews
Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC 30-inch WideScreen LCD Monitor Ultra-High Resolution with Height Adjustable Stand

1 Review
5 star: (1)
4 star: (0)
3 star: (0)
2 star: (0)
1 star: (0)


I love it., August 15, 2008
By M. Wang (CT United States) - See all my reviews

It's big, bright, fast, beautiful and did I mention it's big? I mean two side-by-side magnified A4 documents big. The $1100 price is great too compared to other 30" models.

The reason why this monitor is considered obsolete by Dell is the complaints from videophiles about its lack of connectivity options. Specifically, dual-link DVI is the only way in. So, if you are planning on connecting game machines or BlueRay drives or HD cable boxes via HDMI, you are out of luck. But, why would you want to do that? Even full HD video only goes up to 1920x1080. This monitor does 2560x1600. It makes a lot more sense to pay $800 for a 42" 1080p LCD TV, which is bigger and better for viewing video anyway. This is an ultra-high-resolution monitor, pure and simple, and I love it for doing a good job there.

===== Added 11/29/2008 =====

As the channel runs low on stock of this monitor, the Gateway XHD3000 30" Widescreen HD LCD Monitor becomes a better value. The latter, however, does not employ the S-IPS panel from LG, which is generally considered the best and most expensive LCD technology as of 2008. This is another reason why some 30" monitors are still a good buy in my mind even though 24" models are selling for under $300 nowadays. Those cheap monitors use TN panels, with poor color, contrast and viewing angles. Smaller S-IPS monitors (e.g. HP LP2475W 24in LCD Monitor 1920X1200 and Planar PX2611W 26-Inch Widescreen Digital/Analog with Height Adjust Stand (Black)) still cost $600+ and are becoming scarcer by the day due to the competition from its cheaper cousins. Even Samsung, which holds the patents for the middling S-PVA technology, has been introducing TN models.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What are the pros and cons of LCD vs Plasma vs Rear projection?

Q. I also heard there is no noticable difference between 1080i vs 720p when your set less than 50"

A. LCD - This is the everyman HDTV. Its mass produced, cost effective, low on power consumption, and just what people "know." LCD monitors in computers make it a more familiar product for many. Its SD playback tends to be a bit sharp/crisp; think the evening news (this isn't good vs bad, this is personal taste). Its colors tend to be a bit more muted (again not good vs bad, just taste). LCDs have a matte finish for the viewing surface (the edge around it can be glossy though depending on model).

LCD's are inherently bad with motion playback. The suffer from motion blur (ghost trails). This is why you see "better" ones advertised with 120Hz or 240Hz refresh rates. The improved refresh rates are an attempt to overcome that inherent flaw.

LCD's will give you weaker blacks, colors, and contrasts on the whole. This is why you see the proliferation of the LED LCD. That technological step alleviates those LCD problems.

Plasma TVs inherently give you better blacks, colors, and contrast. They are also inherently strong in motion playback as their refresh rate is near instantaneous (like a CRT). Plasma colors tend to have more pop to them (not good vs bad, just taste). Plasma SD tends to be a bit softer (think Hollywood films); again not good vs bad, just personal taste.

Plasmas should be conditioned though. For the first 100-200 hours of operation you want to keep the contrast and brightness cranked way down. Then optimize and enjoy. This isn't necessary persay, but most "nerd" consumer groups will tell you to do it for paranoia sake.

Plasma TVs are a shiny finish though, so in rooms with light control problems that finish can create reflection problems. Plasma technology on the whole does use more power than LCD. But not all models are made equal, so one must do some homework. And worst case scenario, a "very bad" Plasma TV would likely only cost you $40 more per year in electricity bills (and again not all models are made equal).

Plasma myth (1) - They experience burn-in. This is inaccurate, those days are gone. Just condition the gasses and then use it as normal and you're fine. Also, the better sets have built-in features to prevent this (on top of the technology just generally being better now than say 5 years ago).

Plasma myth (2) - They have short life spans. This is another inaccuracy. Most are now rated in the 60,000-100,000 hours range. At 8 hours a day 365 days a year that would mean a life of 20-30 years. So do you think you'll still want/own the same TV in 15 years, let alone 30?

Plasma myth (3) - They won't work in high altitude because of problems for the gasses. This is again no longer an issue. Current Plasmas can be purchased and used in mile high Denver, and above, so you'll be fine where ever you are (unless you're living in the Himalayas).

720 vs 1080 - There is no set size on when it matters. Typically though its though that anything under 40" definitely doesn't show any of the advantages of 1080. 40" - 50" is the grey area where some argue it matters and others say maybe a bit or not so much. 50" and above you definitely want native 1920x1080 resolution for your TV, as the advantages will become noticeable.

Damn almost forgot... DLP Rear Projection. The image quality, on all levels, is fairly close to Plasma. It would be at par with it if it wasn't a dying technology. Mitsubishi is the last developer of the technology after Samsung recently announced they were giving up on it. So Plasma is just getting more R&D and advancements than DLP. That said though DLP is still a rock solid image.

Its often joked that DLP will be the last TV you ever own. That refers to the expectation that the TV will still work until its actually physically falling apart (decades). But the bulbs in it need to be constantly replaced. Depending on the bulb and your TV usage, it could last anywhere from 1 year to realistically 4 years. Replacing is something you can do on your own easily enough. A new bulb though costs $200-$250 or higher. Also, some sets have air filters that you should clean every month or two. So there is certainly an inconvenience factor in owning the sets.


How to choose gaming LCD/LED monitor?
Q. I am planning to get a new LCD or LED monitor for gaming. What should I look for when choosing a monitor for gaming. Can you also give me some recommendations please.
Thanks

A. There are many important factors to purchasing you monitor.
1- Buy a monitor with a 2ms response rate or less
2- Are you ever going to use nvidia 3d? If yes, buy a monitor with 120hz refresh rate.
3- Resolution. A good gaming resolution for the price is 1920x1080. Most games do not exceed this resolution.
4- Size. Monitors have different lengths, but can have the same resolution. This means the DPI changes, or more pixels per inch square.This really won't make much difference though.
5- Contrast ratio. Look for high contrast ratios.
6- Color. Get a monitor with a wide field of color.
7- LED back lit. This affects the brightness

Verdict

I strongly recommend this monitor:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236083

When I considered buying a new gaming monitor, this was my top pick for the price.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

looking for LCD monitor?

Q. I went to the store (office depot) and they're having a sale, a $150 19" samsung (5ms) and a viewsonic 20" HD. I don't have anything HD maybe a dvd player with component or a wii. I only have a nvidia 6800XT which includes DVI and VGA. The pictures for both look really bad. Must be the graphics card because it looked really out of focus, no sharpness or the VGA. I don't know which to get.... I haven't seen what DVI looks like. I currently have a VGA CRT monitor 15" flat screen.
widescreen plz

A. Don't buy the Dell hype. Viewsonic is a decent monitor. Have 5 or 6 at work and just bought a 20" widescreen myself for home use, mostly gaming. P.S. make sure you use the DVI connection not the VGA. Not sure about your 6800XT but my 6800GTOC does have both types on it.


is this lcd monitor hd or not?
Q. i found a monitor for sale. its a toshiba 32" 2006 model. it doesnt say if its hd. i dont know if monitors in 2006 were all hd yet. the guy says he paid 700 for it in 2006.

A. It isn't worth buying a monitor from 2006 unless it's cheap. He paid a lot because LCD screen technology was still a new thing then, not only that but it was still fairly poor quality. A display of that age is likely to have poor definition, slow response time and a narrow viewing angle. I wouldn't pay more than $30 for it, no matter how much it cost when it was new.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

difference B/W LCD monitor & LCD tv?

Q. i want to buy lcd (max 22") for watching movies as i currently see on my CRT monitor.MY question is what is best way of getting good picture quality LCD or LCD monitor ?

A. Well, and LCD "monitor" will require a TV tuner to receive a
picture. An LCD TV has a built-in TV tuner so you won't need
any outboard tuner (i.e. a stand-alone television).

My choice for best LCD picture is from Sony. I believe they
even have a 23" HDTV. A bit more expensive, but if you
appreciate a great picture, it is worth the extra investment.
Others to consider include Sharp and Panasonic for a 22".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LCD_TV
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDTV
http://www.sonystyle.com

H a p p y
W a t c h i n g !

Xe�


LCD Monitor vs LCD TV ?
Q. I'm buying the display screen for my ps3 but I don't know which is better and what are the differences ?
Price is not major factor, also are monitors usually smaller than TVs ?

A. A video monitor just lacks a tuner to connect an antenna to to watch TV direct.

A computer monitor lacks normal A/V in, remote control, and sometimes even speakers/audio.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Rabu, 30 April 2014

XBOX 360 HD AV Cable and 19 inch LCD Widescreen Monitor?

Q. I was planning on buying a 360 and a VGA HD AV cable to hook up to my monitor. It is an HP w19b, it is widescreen and it runs at 1440x990 max res. I have a couple of questions.

1) When I play games, will my monitor give me black bars at the top or bottom?

2) If it does, how can i fix it so that it would fill the whole screen?

3) What is the max resolution that Halo 3 has?

4) Will my monitor stretch out the games when I play them?

5) Will the picture look different (in how it is stretched/unstretched) from a 40 INCH LCD FLAT PANEL WIDESCREEN 1080P HD TV?

A. 1). Yes, but only because your monitor is 16:10 and not a true native 16:9. Just select 16:9 aspect ratio and the bars won't be visbile or very unnoticable (depends on monitor). I don't know if the game will automatically play at 720p, you might need to enable it in the dashboard.

2). All games support 16:9 480i, use that setting. It should play in 720p which is

3). Halo 3 supports 480i/480p and 720p (not 1080i)

4). Most games support 16:9 480i/480p or greater and the game resolution will be rendered in 16:9, your monitor might stretch it to 16:10 or just have very small black bars.

5). On a 19" monitor, 720p is very high resolution and the Xbox should not strech the aspect ratio of the image too much. It should look great because LCD monitors have much high pixel densities than LCD TVs. The Monitor might look slightly dim deending on the environment


19 inch vs 20 inch lcd monitor?
Q. there's a 19 inch monitor for 133.33 and a 20 inch for 148.99...i'm planning on getting the 2o inch, but do you think the 15 dollar difference is worth choosing 20 from 19 inch OR should i save that money and pick 19 inch?

A. Depends on your value system. How much is an inch worth?

Monitors are like speakers on a stereo. You can have the best system and a cheap monitor and it looks like a cheap system.

Go for the 20", but for a little more you can get a 23" or 24" monitor. That would be better. Make sure you get a 1920 x 1080 resolution that is DHCP capable and if you plan on HD content get one with an HDMI port.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Selasa, 29 April 2014

Where can I find a 4K resolution television?

Q. I need the clearest quality for my home theater.

A. Commodity-priced 4K TVs for mainstream consumer use are not quite ready for prime time. However if one is unwilling to wait there is a greater selection of monitors and video projectors from which to choose. (See the resources below for more info.)

RESOURCES

Astro Design 4K Monitor Lineup
http://www.astrodesign.co.jp/english/category/products/video-equipment/waveform-and-professional-monitor-llineup

eyevis EYE-LCD Series - Ultra-high Resolution LCD Monitors
http://www.eyevis.de/index.php?article_id=12&clang=1

Panasonic TH-152UX1 Professional Plasma Display
http://www.panasonic.com/business/plasma/premiere_series/panasonic-premiere-plasma-series.asp

Toshiba Announces the Release of the QFHD REGZA 55X3 LCD TV (Japanese)
http://www.toshiba.co.jp/about/press/2011_10/pr_j0302.htm

TVLogic LUM-560W 56-inch (4K) Quad HD or 4K Monitor
http://www.tvlogic.tv/Monitors/M_L_Con.asp?idx=19

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Engadget
� Toshiba�s 4K, Glasses-free 3DTV Announced in Japan
http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/03/toshibas-4k-glasses-free-3dtv-announced-in-japan-with-more-spe/
� Galleries: Toshiba REGZA 55x3
http://www.engadget.com/photos/toshibas-regza-55x3-announced-as-worlds-first-4k2k-tv-with-glasses-free-3d/

Toshiba Explains Details of 55-inch 4k2k Naked-eye 3D TV
http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20111005/198987/

[YouTube] Toshiba REGZA 55X3 at CEATEC JAPAN 2011 (Japanese)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z79xvZfcDjw

Wiki: 4K Resolution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4K_resolution
 


Samsung 64inch plasma vs samsung 60inch LED TV?
Q. Cant decide on which TV to get:

http://www.harveynorman.com.au/samsung-64-series-8-full-hd-plasma-tv.html
Or
http://www.thegoodguys.com.au/cannington/Samsung_60%22_152cm_full_HD_LED_LCD_100Hz_3D_TV_UA60ES6500M

Will be the main family TV in a 60 square meter room with quite a bit of direct sunlight into the room, it will also inside an alcove.

We watch a lot of sports (soccer, F1, AFL and basketball mainly), movies and standard televison.

The plasma is a series 8 model which is the 2012 model while the LED is the 2011 model.

Please help
Cheers
Thanks

We currently sit about 3.5/4 meters away depending if the chairs are reclined so hopefully its just far enough.
Also which would have the better picture quality?
With blinds shut or at night would the plasma be a better choice?

A. A Display
First, you�ll need a 3D-ready display�whether it�s a 3D HDTV, 3D projector, or 3D computer monitor. These displays have more processing power than standard 2D models for displaying 3D images in rapid succession.

A Source
Your display may be ready for 3D playback, but you�ll still need a device to read 3D content. This can be a cable box with a subscription to a 3D channel, a 3D Blu-ray Disc player, or a PlayStation 3 system.

3D Content
3D content�the actual entertainment, in other words�will be played back using the source mentioned above, whether it�s a 3D broadcast from your cable provider, a 3D Blu-ray Disc, or a 3D video game.

3D Glasses
For now, the vast majority of 3D HDTVs require glasses for 3D viewing. Many use powered �active shutter� glasses, others polarized �passive� glasses. You�ll need one pair per viewer, and they�ll have to be compatible with your display, whether they�re the same brand, or a pair of �universal� glasses designed to work across brands.

HDMI Cable
To connect your source (such as a 3D Blu-ray Disc player) to your display, you�ll need a high-speed HDMI cable. Cables with this designation feature bandwidth speeds up to 10.2 Gbps (gigabits per second), for carrying the 3D signal without any loss of quality.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Senin, 28 April 2014

Do USB Arms work on Desktop Computers?

Q. I was thinking of getting a new video camera, but was wondering if the USB arm on it would work on a desktop computer, or only on laptops?

A. USB arm? USB connectors are standard. Arms aren't but if you're concerned about the large clip, it will work on desktop LCD monitors.


What has been developed to make monitors more ergonomically correct?
Q. I have a project on ergonomics and my topoic is CRT monitors vs LCD!

PLZZZ HELP!!!!

A. Monitor Arms
http://www.ergostoreonline.com/crt_arms.html

Monitor Stands
http://www.ergonomictimes.com/product/B000A2AHUG/All/201///KensingtonK60089MonitorStandPluswithSmartFitSystem

Anti-Glare Screens
http://www.kareproducts.com/goodybye-glare-screen-economy-p-1106.html?osCsid=38a0b4131553354f29326a24c4c8a438

In-line Document Holders
http://www.vu-ryte.com/index.htm

regards,
Philip T





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Getting an HD monitor for my games anything I should know?

Q. Alright finally going to look into getting a led back-light or a normal lcd monitor for my gaming pc felt like I wasting my hd video card with a basic gateway monitor. Well more correctly a friend asked me if I wanted one and which one

Anything I should avoid getting and anything I should look out for. Basically they will be getting it from mcriocenter and looking at something like this

http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0360134

I am not sure if such things are good for gaming or such have ati hd 5850 graphics card.

Sorry for any errors or typos. and thanks ahead of time.
So need one with hdmi or dvi?
Would something like this better apart form the built in speakers.

A. I have a samsung monitor myself (also a 24") and it's a great monitor. Samsung is a very good brand in my opinion.Reading expert reviews would always be a good thing, but you would have to find those. Try to find some user-experiances also.

One thing to think about is what to do if the monitor is defect like having dead pixels (often some dead pixels are called acceptable, but if i would see a visible dead pixel on my new monitor i'd be very disappointed) Luckily the 2 lcd-monitors i ever bought (a philips and a samsung) had no dead pixels whatsoever and were of exelent build quality. I stopped using the philips monitor because it was only a 3:4 19" but it's still working, and my samsung is already working for years without any problem. Bad luck can always strike though so it makes sense to way your options in advance, just in case there are visible dead pixels or other problems.

There are a lot of technical details you might want to pay attention to like viewing-angle (especially important if you plan not to sit straight for your monitor) , ghosting (probably non-existant in your monitor would be my guess), contrast-ratio (the strength of the picture in a bright room) powerconsumption (27 watt and 0.3 standby is pretty neat) etc. but since the samsung is about the cheapest 24" monitor on the site and it's a samsung with also some good specs, and is also led backlit monitor, my first impression is that it's a good choice.

The 24" size is a very nice size for on a desk. My monitor still uses the older 16:10 aspect ratio (samsung syncmaster T240) Your monitor might look a bit smaller because of it's (new) 16:9 aspect ratio. Of course you want a full HD monitor which this monitor is. For gaming you probly would use a bit lower resolution and if you are not a complete gaming-nerd that only wants the best of the best im pretty sure you won't be able to find anything wrong with the pictures it wil produce. Although 1920 x 1200 (this is a 16:10 resolution) is the maximum and also recommended resolution for my monitor i run windows in a 1280 x 800 resolution which gives nice big letters but also leaves a lot of space.

The site doesn't say what and how many inputs the monitor has. I think it has no hdmi connector though (a pitty i think, but not directly a reason not to buy the monitor), but it does have an dvi-d or dvdi-i (dual-link) connector (i can see the connector on the pic of the rear of the monitor, together with a d-sub connector, ) . This is strange because the specs on the samsung site only mention d-sub in (vga) and composite video (i think this is a mistake) in: http://www.samsung.com/us/computer/monitors/LS24A350HS/ZA-specs
I think though it's safe to asume there is a digital dvi in (would be pretty weird if there was no digital input at all) and that should be enough although an additional hdmi in (like on my monitor) would have been better. DVI-d or DVI-i can carry the hdmi signal but without sound .This may lead to some more cable-clutter and the need to buy a hdmi to dvi adapter, and maybe an adapter that splits audio from a hmdmi signal, for example.

The lack of a hdmi input may be a very big nuisance if you want to connect several hdmi-devices to your monitor because for instance if you'd have a hdmi tv-tuner with just hdmi out and want to hook it up to your monitor you can only hear the sound if you find an adapter that splits the sound from the signal. I think though that all connection problems are solvable but it would be a hell of a lot easier when there was a hdmi in. The reason for omitting hdmi in wil be the price i think and if you just use the monitor as a simple computer-monitor for a computer with dvi-out and not want to connect a lot of extra devices there should be no problem at all. However it might be worthwhile to look for a monitor with hdmi in and to think ahead very carefully on what connections you want to make especially relating to the fact that hdmi carries sound and dvi doesn't. My monitor for example does have hdmi-in and no speakers but audio out allowing me to hook up my own speakers to the monitor to hear the sound that comes through the hdmi cable. Again: in a simple setup using dvi might be no problem but the lack of hdmi-in can become awkward in some situations.

Notes: you can use the d-sub connector to connect a computer with dvi-i out (not dvi-d but most videocards have dvi-i) using a dvi-i to d-sub (vga) cable or adapter leaving the dvi connector to connect another device like a hdmi-device but without sound:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=244973&CatId=467
(vga may sound old but has about the same picture-quality as dvi or hdmi, especially over a short distance) Hdmi lends itself very wel for switching (using a switch box) and should be the preferred way of making your connections.


Which LCD Monitor?
Q. Which one should i choose Samsung SyncMaster 206BW Black 20" Widescreen LCD Monitor 2ms or Samsung SyncMaster 245BW Black 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor 5ms or HP (Hewlett-Packard) W2207 B 22" lcd monitor 5ms.

A. If you are into Gaming and Videos...

Get the lower Response Time 2MS ...

"Samsung" is the best in Monitors for quality and durability ...

Most Branded names uses "Samsung" componentson their product coz they know Quality...

NOTE: If your are planning to have the 20" size try to compare prices with the 19" inch ..
Almost the same size a minimal of an inch..
But will cost you much if you get a 20"inch..
That's why I settle for a 19" inch Tho..!


If you really want a bigger size consider the Price range as sizes goes up..

Be practical ...ok


If you're lookin for a cheaper price but Good Specs like the Branded ones...

Look for a "ViewSonic" with Low Response Time ..

Good Reviews on this Brand of monitor despite it's price...

Anyway it was my second choice ...





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Minggu, 27 April 2014

DSLR Camera Comparison Nikon or Canon?

Q. Looking to purchase good beginner DLSR camera, no previous lenses, starting from scratch and would be happy with just 2 decent lenses, not looking to go pro, just family photos, travel photos, kids' events, etc.
Comparing Nikon D60 package that comes with 2 lenses from BestBuy vs, Nikon D80, or Canon XSi. Any suggestions?

A. Digital camera for beginner I think Nikon D60 and D40 the best now

Nikon D40 6.1MP Digital SLR Camera

The lightest, most compact Nikon digital SLR ever, featuring intuitive controls and an ergonomically designed operation that even first-time SLR users can enjoy. Advanced 3-area AF system Automatic control over ISO-equivalent sensitivity from ISO 200 to 1600 with manual override Eight automated Digital Vari-Programs [Auto, Auto (Flash Off), Portrait, Landscape, Child, Sports, Close Up, and Night Portrait] optimize white balance, sharpening, tone, color, saturation and hue to match the scene Near-instant 0.18-second power-up Versatile shutter speed control with a range from 30 to 1/4000 s, plus bulb Creative in-camera effects and editing functions consolidated under the new Retouch menu, including D-Lighting, Red-eye correction, Trim, Monochrome settings (Black-and-white, Sepia, Cyanotype), Filter Effects (Skylight, Warm filter, Color balance), Small Picture and Image Overlay Large 2.5-inch LCD monitor Information displays can be shown in Classic, Graphic or Wallpaper format Assist Images help select the appropriate settings for many camera features by showing an example image typical of that setting Large, bright viewfinder with 0.8x magnification Fast image data transfer and recording to SD memory cards of up to 4GB capacity Exposure Metering System - TTL full-aperture exposure metering system Electronic-Flash - Auto, Portrait, Child, Close Up, Night Portrait modes Uses Nikon AF-S Lenses Unit Dimensions (W x D x H) - Approximately 5.0 x 2.5 x 3.7 inches; Weight - Approximately 1lb. 1oz. without battery, memory card or body cap Nikon USA 1-Year Warranty

# 6.1-megapixel CCD captures enough detail for photo-quality 14 x 19-inch prints
# Kit includes 3x 18-55mm f3.5-5.6G ED II AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor lens
# 2.5-inch LCD with three display options; built-in flash and hot shoe
# Fast startup with instant shutter response; shoot at up to 2.5 frames per second
# Powered by one rechargeable Li-ion battery EN-EL9 (included); stores images on SD memory cards
Read more for nikon http://astore.amazon.com/canon-bestseller-20/detail/B000KJQ1DG

Canon Digital Rebel XSi 12.2 MP Digital SLR Camera

For photography with point-and-shoot ease, look no further than Canon's EOS Rebel XSi. The EOS Rebel XSi brings staggering technological innovation to the masses. It features Canon's EOS Integrated Cleaning System, Live View Function, a powerful DIGIC III Image Processor, and a 12.2-megapixel CMOS Sensor with Optical Image Stabilizer. The EOS Rebel XSi's refined, ergonomic design includes a 3.0" LCD monitor, compatibility with SD and SDHC Memory cards and accessories that enhance every aspect of the photographic experience. Image Format - 22.2mm x 14.8mm 3 - 2 Horizontal - Vertical Aspect Ratio Color Filter System - RGB primary color filter Low-pass Filter - Located in front of the image sensor, non-removable Recording Format - Design rule for Camera File System 2.0 Image Format - JPEG, RAW (14-bit Canon original) RAW+JPEG White Balance Settings - Auto, Daylight, Shade, Cloudy, Tungsten, White Fluorescent Light, Flash, and Custom Focusing Modes - One-Shot AF, AI Servo AF, AI Focus AF, Manual focusing (MF) Metering Range - EV 1-20 (with EF50mm f/1.4 USM lens, ISO 100) Exposure Compensation - Manual 2 stops in 1/3 or 1/2-stop increments and AEB 2 stops in 1/3 or 1/2-stop increments AE Lock - Automatic when focus achieved with evaluative metering and One-Shot AF, and Manual by AE lock button Shutter Type - Electronically controlled and focal-plane shutter Shutter Speeds - 1/4000 seconds to 1/60 seconds, X-sync at 1/200 seconds, 1/4000 sec. to 30 seconds, bulb Self-timer - 10-seconds, 2-seconds delay or 10-seconds delay plus continuous shooting Brightness Control - 7 levels provided Body Dimensions - 5.1 x 3.8 x 2.4 (128.8x97.5x61.9mm) Weight - 16.8 ounces (475 grams) body only Lens Dimension - 2.7 x 2.6 (69x66.2mm) Weight - 6 ounces (190 grams)

# 12.2-megapixel CMOS sensor captures enough detail for poster-size, photo-quality prints
# Large 3.0-inch LCD display; includes Canon's EF-S 18-55mm, f3.5-5.6 IS zoom lens
# DIGIC III image processor provides fast, accurate image processing; improved Autofocus and framing rate
# EOS Integrated Cleaning system, plus Dust Delete Data Detection in included software
# Stores images on SD/SDHC memory cards

http://astore.amazon.com/canon-bestseller-20/detail/B0012YA85A

Read more for other item for canon digital camera and try to read reveiw for more information from amazon ,ebay ,cnet or other.They will give you more information.


DSLR Recommendations?
Q. Need a little advice here. I am semi-literate in DSLR terminology and use and I think enough so to make at least a relatively informed comparison between products but I am very inexperienced with them none the less.

My father is planning on buying a new DSLR that he intends to use to take landscape photographs with the highest possible detail. He is not a photographer and not experienced, his requirements are high build quality, the unit must be able to keep dirt out as best as possible and it may well get wet, also, though I'm fairly sure he'd be hard pressed to perceive the extra quality, he is insistent upon very high sensitivity and quality. So far he is focusing his comparison upon canon 40d. it's equivalent in Nikon (I've forgotten the name) and the Nikon D700, the last one is one he looked at and had some advice on and he was told it was a professional camera that throws you in the deep end and is not easy on amateurs though my father tends to like to buy things given that type of description regardless of whether or not it's best suited because he tends to think it will be the best overall product because it is high range and high price.

He seems to be willing to spend any between 1000 to 2000 Pounds Sterling on it, though I'm rather hoping I can convince not to go quite so off the rails on something he's unlikely to use very often, anyway what camera (any camera not just the ones I mentioned) do you think would be good for this type of photography with an amateur behind the lens?
Seems to be some controversy over built in image stabilization and lens built stabilization, with where I am in my research and knowledge though not experience I'm inclined to believe that image stabilization is better built into the lens for minimal interference to the end result. Aside from the convenience of working with any lens, does any have any reason to recommend image stabilization built within the camera body?

A. The D700 is a wonderful camera if you want or need a full frame sensor. Here are some of the features:
12.1 megapixel full-frame sensor (8.45µm pixel pitch)
Image Sensor Cleaning (vibration) *
ISO 200 - 6400 (with boost up to ISO 25600 and down to ISO 100)
Also supports DX lenses, viewfinder automatically masks (5.1 megapixels with DX lens)
14-bit A/D conversion, 12 channel readout
Same ultra-fast startup and shutter lag as D3
Nikon EXPEED image processor (Capture NX processing and NR algorithms, lower power)
New Kevlar / carbon fibre composite shutter with 150,000 exposure durability *
Multi-CAM3500FX Auto Focus sensor (51-point, 15 cross-type, more vertical coverage)
Auto-focus tracking by color (using information from 1005-pixel AE sensor)
95% coverage, 0.72x magnification viewfinder *
Auto-focus calibration (fine-tuning), fixed body or up to 20 separate lens settings
Scene Recognition System (uses AE sensor, AF sensor)
Picture Control image parameter presets
5 frames per second continuous with auto-focus tracking*
Optional MB-D10 Battery Pack (same as D300), increases burst rate to 8 fps *
UDMA compatible single CF card slot *
3.0" 922,000 pixel LCD monitor
Live View with either phase detect (mirror up/down) or contrast detect Auto Focus
Virtual horizon indicates if camera is level (like an aircraft cockpit display)
HDMI HD video output
'Active D-Lighting' (adjusts metering as well as applying D-Lighting curve)
Detailed 'Control Panel' type display on LCD monitor, changes color in darkness
Magnesium alloy body with connections and buttons sealed against moisture
Improved Info display on main screen *
DPreview said of this camera "The D700 joins the D3 as a fully-fledged 'professional' model; it has the same tank-like build quality "


The D300 is in the price range and also a great camera with superior photos with an APS-c sized sensor.. It has a flexible program mode and auto white balance and auto ISO so you can use almost automatic. It does have more options and more features to learn. It also has an aperature priority mode, shutter speed priority mode, and full manual. It does not have programed modes like Auto, Portrait, Landscape, Children, Night etc. These auto modes tend to be limiting and many people outgrow using them anyway. So Nikon does not put them on any of the high end cameras.

Nikon and canon put the image stabilization in the lens. Some other manufacturers it in the body. In lens system work smoother and faster with less impact on focus times. So that is why the two largest camera manufacturers went with in lens systems for stabilization.

So either of these he could start out shooting in program and then then use the other setting as he gets more comfortable with him. If he does not want that level the D60 while it does not give you the features of the D300 or D700 gives you all of the features most entry and mid range photographers use and it would give you more money for lenses and such. for landscape he is definitely going to want a good fast wide angle lens.

Email me if I can help

Additional on image stabilization From the Canon white paper this explains some of why Canon and Nikon chose in lens.The same argument for Nikons VR over the in body systems would hold true, hope it helps

"Some of Canon�s competitors have chosen to use in-body image stabilization. The technique involves moving the image sensor in a controlled fashion, based on signals from movement detecting sensors in the camera body. The obvious advantage of this system is that users have some sort of stabilization available with almost any lens they connect to the body. Short focal length lenses require smaller sensor deflections; 24 or 28 mm lenses might need only 1 mm or so. Longer lenses necessitate much greater movement; 300 mm lenses would have to move the sensor about 5.5 mm (nearly 1/4�) to achieve the correction Canon gets with its IS system at the same focal length. This degree of sensor movement is beyond the range of current technology. Short and 'normal' focal length lenses need stabilization much less often than long lenses, so the lenses that need the most help get the least."

Added: and again a bit more on the image stabilization controversy
http://www.cheapshooter.com/2007/09/03/in-camera-image-stabilization-cant-trump-lens-technology/

And Nikons View on it
"(Image Stabilization) in the lens effectively corrects blur in the finder as well as in the image itself. A clear view makes it easier to capture your subject in the focus frame and confirm photo composition.
On the other hand, with cameras that correct the image blur by adjusting an image sensor (cameras that correct image blur inside the camera body), the image in the finder remains blurred." - Nikon
We probably will not decide here which works better and they both work to some degree but I do love a good debate on this type of thing ~grin~





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Canon 7D vs. Nikon D300?

Q. which one do you prefer the most and why ?
is 17MP really matter vs. 12 MP.

A. Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD and 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Standard Zoom Lens.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EOS-7D-28-135mm-Standard/dp/B002NEGTU6/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1260071382&sr=1-2&tag=commentglitte-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325

By any measure, the new Canon EOS 7D is a worthy successor to the EOS line of APS-C sensor DSLRs. I believe it finally levels the playing field for many Canon shooters envious of Nikon DXXX shooters.

I am an advanced amateur photographer who has owned the 20D for the last 5 years and will use it as a backup body now. With each Canon announcement of a successor to the XXD line of DSLRs, I was tempted to upgrade but resisted each time up until now. This was partly due to budgetary constraints, but I felt mostly that each new model was only an evolutionary modification rather than a revolutionary one. If there's one thing to keep in mind in this fast-moving world of DSLR photography, then it is that DSLR bodies come and go (and depreciate quickly in value, like most electronic goods) but excellent glass will nearly always be sound investments (high-quality lenses maintained in good condition may appreciate in value).

The 7D appears to be a game-changer for many Canon photo enthusiasts like myself who prefer or can only afford to shoot with an APS-C sensor body. Nikon shooters have had an excellent choice of a crop sensor body in the D100/D200/D300 (now D300s), but for Canon shooters, the top-of-the-line equivalent was trailing in the feature set department. Now most of the features that were absent in the Canon XXD body as compared with their main rival are present in the 7D.

Notable features:
- 18 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- Dual DIGIC 4 processors (a first for a prosumer Canon DSLR)
- Maximum 8 fps frame rate
- Maximum ISO 12,800
- VF with 100% coverage and 1.0x magnification (a first for a Canon DSLR)
- 19-pt AF (all cross-type with f/5.6 or faster lenses)
- 63-zone metering system (measures focus, color, and luminance)
- On-demand grid lines in VF (a first for any Canon DSLR)
- Built-in electronic leveler in 2 planes (a first for any Canon DSLR)
- Built-in wireless flash trigger (a first for any Canon DSLR)
- HD video in 1080p (30/25/24 fps) and 720p (60/50 fps)

I have had the camera for over a week now. My initial impressions are mostly positive thus far. Additional thoughts in the form of updates will be forthcoming once I get an opportunity to capture more images under various conditions (indoors/low light, outdoors, action, etc.) and get my act together to type it up. So far, I believe that the IQ, VF, LCD monitor, and handling are all vast improvements over the 20D. Taking photos at high ISOs and achieving low noise captures is all the rage these days. I feel that random photos I've taken at ISO settings up to 1600 are completely usuable. In the past, I felt comfortable shooting with my 20D mostly south of ISO 400/800. I shall pixel peep some more and shoot at even higher ISOs to see where the happy medium for me shooting with the 7D lies. Tolerance for noise, I feel, is very subjective.


Limitations:
There is a steep learning curve with this camera. The 7D is packed with new features that I have yet to maximize to my advantage. Coming from a 20D rather than a more recent line of XXD body makes things even more challenging. A careful read of the user's manual is critical.

If ultimately low noise captures at high ISOs is most important to you, then a FF sensor body is the way to go rather than an APS-C sensor body. A larger pixel pitch that captures more light (at the expense of lower resolution) will help maintain low noise levels at very high ISOs. This is a key reason why the small-body FFs, such as the Nikon D700, Canon 5D/5DMkII, and Sony A900/A850, are so revered. Any of those cameras will likely outperform the 7D at high ISOs in terms of low noise captures. Moreover, they provide less DoF than APS-Cs at equivalent fields of view. However, the obvious downsides are their cost and need for big, heavy, and expensive glass.

The 7D should not be viewed as an HD camcorder replacement. Although useful to have and with slightly more shooting options as compared with the version currently offered in the 5DMkII, video capture in the 7D still suffers from lack of continuous AF. Unfortunately, the jello phenomenon (from rolling shutter) and monoaural sound (external stereo mic input is available, though) make for a less than harmonious package.

*** Please be aware that some information about potential problems with the initial batch of 7D bodies has surfaced on photography forums and elsewhere (including here on Amazon). They include difficulties with the new AF system (particularly in AI servo mode, though some users have had trouble in any AF mode) resulting in OOF photos, as well as ghosting (residual preceding images captured in subsequent images) under certain sho


Canon 7D good for filmmaking?
Q. I am an aspiring filmamker and I need a good camera that will last and is simple to learn to work. What do you guys think about the Canon 7D?

A. the cannon 7D is an excelent choice but i would prefer the 5D here is the specs for both - 7D :
Imaging

Imaging Sensor/Effective Pixels
CMOS/ 18 MP (APS-C)

Effective Sensor Size
22.3 x 14.9 mm

A/D Resolution Power
14-bit

Colour Filter Size
RGB Primary Colours

35mm Focal Length Equivalent
1.6x

Image Recording

Medium
CF Type I & II

Image Size

Large / Fine
5,184 x 3,456 / Approx 17.9MB

Middle / Fine
3,456 x 2,304 / Approx 8.0MB

Small / Fine
2,592 x 1,728 / Approx 14.5MB

RAW
5,184 x 3,456 / Approx 17.9MB

mRAW
3,888 x 2,592 / Approx 10.1MB

sRAW
2,592 x 1,728 / Approx 4.5MB

Movie Shooting

1920 x 1080
Available in frame rates 30 / 25 / 24 fps

1280 x 720
Available in frame rates 60 / 50 fps

640 x 480
Available in frame rates 60 / 50 fps

Viewfinder

Coverage (vertical/horizontal)
100% coverage

Dioptric Adjustment
3 to +1 dpt

Interchangeable Focusing Screens
Fixed

Autofocus

AF Points
19

Exposure Control

Shooting Modes
9

Metering Segments
63

Metering Modes
Evaluative, Partial, Spot, Centre-weighted

ISO Speed Range
ISO 100-6400 (expandable to H: 12800) (expandable to 3200 via CF)

Exposure Compensation
Manual, AEB ±5: 1/3 or 1/2-half increments

Shutter

Shutter Speed
1/8000 sec. -30., Bulb, X-sync at 1/250 sec

Flash Control

E-TTL II Autoflash
Yes

Built-in Flash / G. No.
Provided / 12

Speed

Shooting Speed
8 fps / 90 shot max burst (JPEG), 15 (RAW)

White Balance

Settings
9

WB Bracketing
Yes

General Features

LCD Monitor
3.0 ClearView II (Approx. 920K dots)

Custom Functions/Settings
27

Start Up Time
0.1sec

Personal Functions/Settings
Yes

Integrated Cleaning System
Yes

Live View
Yes (Quick, Live & Live Face Detection AF Modes)

External Interface
Hi-Speed USB/ Video OUT/HDMI

Remote Control/Type
Yes (N3 type)

Battery
LP-E6

Chassis Material
Stainless Steel + polycarbonate with glass fibre

Dimensions (W x D x H) mm
148.2 x 110.7 x 73.5mm

Weight (excl. battery in grams)
820


5D :
Imaging

Imaging Sensor/Effective Pixels
21.1 Megapixel CMOS sensor

Effective Sensor Size
36 x 24 mm

A/D Resolution Power
14-bit

Colour Filter Size
Primary Colours

35mm Focal Length Equivalent
1x

Image Recording

Medium
CF card Types I & II (2GB or higher)

Image Size

Large / Fine
5616 x 3744 pixels; approx. 21 MB

Large / Normal
5616 x 3744 pixels; approx. 21 MB

Medium / Fine
4080 x 2720 pixels; approx. 11.1 MB

Medium / Normal
4080 x 2720 pixels; approx. 11.1 MB

Small / Fine
2784 x 1856 pixels; approx. 5.2 MB

Small / Normal
2784 x 1856 pixels; approx. 5.2 MB

RAW
5616 x 3744 / Approx 21MB

S RAW
1 - 3861 x 2574 / Approx 10MB

S RAW 2
2784 x 1856 / Approx 5.2MB

RAW & JPEG Simultaneous Recording
Yes

Viewfinder

Coverage (vertical/horizontal)
0.98

Dioptric Adjustment
3 to +1 dpt

Interchangeable Focusing Screens
Yes

Auto Focus

AF Points
9 cross type + 6 assist

Exposure Control

Shooting Modes
7 standard modes

Metering Segments
35

Metering Modes
Evaluative, Partial, Spot, Centre-weighted average

ISO Speed Range
ISO 100-6400(L1: 50, H1: 12800, H2: 25600)

Exposure Compensation
Manual, AEB ±2: - 1/3 or 1/2-stop increments

Shutter

Shutter Speed
1/8000 sec � 30, bulb, X-sync 1/200 sec.

Flash Control

E-TTL II Autoflash
Yes

Built-in Flash / Guide Number
N/A

Speed

Shooting Speed
3.9 fps

White Balance

Settings
9

WB Bracketing
Yes

General Features

LCD Monitor
3 inch

Custom Functions/Settings
25

Start Up Time
0.1 sec

Integrated Cleaning System
Yes

Live View
Yes (Quick, Live & Live face detection AF Modes)

External Interface
Hi-Speed USB/ HDMI mini/ Audio/Video OUT/ PC Terminal/ Remote control/External microphone input

Remote Control Terminal
Yes (RC-1, RC-5 compatible)

Battery
Lithium Ion LP-E6

Chassis Material
Stainless Steel

Dimensions (W x H x D) mm
152 x 113.5 x 75

Weight excl. battery (g)
810
there is a big diff in price aswell,
but for a bigginer the 7D is an excellent choice :D





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

LCD Computer monitor question on brands..Acer Vs. Samsung? HD?

Q. Does it make a difference if its HD LCD or just LCD? Also is there a difference in Acer brand and Samsung?

A. it doesnt make much of a difference of what it is called because, its they type of screens you use in the monitor that makes the difference. most monitors can do more that 1080p resolution but its the type of lcd and backlighting the monitor has that will affect performance.

from experience Acers are usually cheaper and not as great quality as the Samsung monitors. another good quality is to check out the Dell monitors or the HP business class monitors too. both dell and hp use the samsung kits and re-brand it as thier own.


which one is better, plasma or LCD monitors? And which brand is preferred in each of them?
Q.

A. It really depends on so many things, for example, what you will use them for and where you will use them.

For example, if you will get a very large set (60 plus inches) you are better off with Plasma, because LCD can be very expensive when it is so big.

For sets 50 inch or smaller, you probably should go with LCD, because LCD is easier to deal with. There is no risk of 'burn in', which can permanently damage a Plasma TV.

This does not tell the entire story and you will need to do some more reading to find out what set is best for you and your situation. Below is one place you can go to get more information about Flat Panel TVs:





Powered by Yahoo! Answers