Sabtu, 26 April 2014

Cheap HDMI Field Monitor?

Q. Is there any cheap HDMI field monitor, for under 100$ preferably? At least 7"

A. There is nothing "cheap" about HDMI field monitors, but for around $200 you can find a number of them

http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=hdmi+field+monitor&tag=mh0b-20&index=electronics&hvadid=1675750756&ref=pd_sl_4qji5j6alk_e

But for any quality, you need to consider something like this

http://www.coollcd.com/ruige-tls701hda-7-oncamera-hd-lcd-field-monitor-for-dslr-canon-5d-7d-hd-video-cameras_p811.html

You did not mention if you were using this monitor with a dSLR. If so, you need to spend some time on this link

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/camcorders/cam-cam.shtml

And this

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/techniques/3_years_later_dslr_video_one_mans_perspective.shtml

By the time you add all the accessories necessary to make your dSLR a viable video camera, you could buy a real video camera


Canon 7D vs. Nikon D300?
Q. which one do you prefer the most and why ?
is 17MP really matter vs. 12 MP.

A. Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD and 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Standard Zoom Lens.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EOS-7D-28-135mm-Standard/dp/B002NEGTU6/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1260071382&sr=1-2&tag=commentglitte-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325

By any measure, the new Canon EOS 7D is a worthy successor to the EOS line of APS-C sensor DSLRs. I believe it finally levels the playing field for many Canon shooters envious of Nikon DXXX shooters.

I am an advanced amateur photographer who has owned the 20D for the last 5 years and will use it as a backup body now. With each Canon announcement of a successor to the XXD line of DSLRs, I was tempted to upgrade but resisted each time up until now. This was partly due to budgetary constraints, but I felt mostly that each new model was only an evolutionary modification rather than a revolutionary one. If there's one thing to keep in mind in this fast-moving world of DSLR photography, then it is that DSLR bodies come and go (and depreciate quickly in value, like most electronic goods) but excellent glass will nearly always be sound investments (high-quality lenses maintained in good condition may appreciate in value).

The 7D appears to be a game-changer for many Canon photo enthusiasts like myself who prefer or can only afford to shoot with an APS-C sensor body. Nikon shooters have had an excellent choice of a crop sensor body in the D100/D200/D300 (now D300s), but for Canon shooters, the top-of-the-line equivalent was trailing in the feature set department. Now most of the features that were absent in the Canon XXD body as compared with their main rival are present in the 7D.

Notable features:
- 18 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- Dual DIGIC 4 processors (a first for a prosumer Canon DSLR)
- Maximum 8 fps frame rate
- Maximum ISO 12,800
- VF with 100% coverage and 1.0x magnification (a first for a Canon DSLR)
- 19-pt AF (all cross-type with f/5.6 or faster lenses)
- 63-zone metering system (measures focus, color, and luminance)
- On-demand grid lines in VF (a first for any Canon DSLR)
- Built-in electronic leveler in 2 planes (a first for any Canon DSLR)
- Built-in wireless flash trigger (a first for any Canon DSLR)
- HD video in 1080p (30/25/24 fps) and 720p (60/50 fps)

I have had the camera for over a week now. My initial impressions are mostly positive thus far. Additional thoughts in the form of updates will be forthcoming once I get an opportunity to capture more images under various conditions (indoors/low light, outdoors, action, etc.) and get my act together to type it up. So far, I believe that the IQ, VF, LCD monitor, and handling are all vast improvements over the 20D. Taking photos at high ISOs and achieving low noise captures is all the rage these days. I feel that random photos I've taken at ISO settings up to 1600 are completely usuable. In the past, I felt comfortable shooting with my 20D mostly south of ISO 400/800. I shall pixel peep some more and shoot at even higher ISOs to see where the happy medium for me shooting with the 7D lies. Tolerance for noise, I feel, is very subjective.


Limitations:
There is a steep learning curve with this camera. The 7D is packed with new features that I have yet to maximize to my advantage. Coming from a 20D rather than a more recent line of XXD body makes things even more challenging. A careful read of the user's manual is critical.

If ultimately low noise captures at high ISOs is most important to you, then a FF sensor body is the way to go rather than an APS-C sensor body. A larger pixel pitch that captures more light (at the expense of lower resolution) will help maintain low noise levels at very high ISOs. This is a key reason why the small-body FFs, such as the Nikon D700, Canon 5D/5DMkII, and Sony A900/A850, are so revered. Any of those cameras will likely outperform the 7D at high ISOs in terms of low noise captures. Moreover, they provide less DoF than APS-Cs at equivalent fields of view. However, the obvious downsides are their cost and need for big, heavy, and expensive glass.

The 7D should not be viewed as an HD camcorder replacement. Although useful to have and with slightly more shooting options as compared with the version currently offered in the 5DMkII, video capture in the 7D still suffers from lack of continuous AF. Unfortunately, the jello phenomenon (from rolling shutter) and monoaural sound (external stereo mic input is available, though) make for a less than harmonious package.

*** Please be aware that some information about potential problems with the initial batch of 7D bodies has surfaced on photography forums and elsewhere (including here on Amazon). They include difficulties with the new AF system (particularly in AI servo mode, though some users have had trouble in any AF mode) resulting in OOF photos, as well as ghosting (residual preceding images captured in subsequent images) under certain sho





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

17" tft monitor Vs LCD monitor?

Q. Is it Ok to dispose off my 17" TFT monitor (Samsung syncmaster) and go for a 17" or above LCD monitor? will it be beneficial in any way? space is not much of a problem.

A. I have a Samsung SyncMaster 2032MW (1680x1050 Resolution : 720p / 1080i) 20" widescreen.

LCD monitors are more vibrant. Hey if you use it as a PC monitor, you should consider getting the Samsung SyncMaster 2032MW. It has high resolution considering it is not full HD.

Also if you have a Xbox 360 or PS3 you can get HD out of it. :)

peace


Lowest Power Consumption in a 17" LCD/TFT Monitor?
Q. I'm currently using a 17" LCD LG Flatron monitor and boy am taking a serious hit on my electricity bill.. Please suggest me a low power consumption LCD/TFT monitor and in an affordable range.

A. Normal CCFL-backlit LCD monitors don't use an extraordinary amount of power. Typical 17-inch LCD monitors might consume 40 watts or so.

I doubt your LCD monitor is what's causing your large electrical bill.

Anyway, the most power-efficient monitors are the ones using LED backlighting. You will not find LED monitors to be cheap, however.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Jumat, 25 April 2014

How can I optimize my monitor resolution with my Macbook Pro?

Q. I have a 23" ASUS LCD monitor that I was using via HDMI with my PC. Now I have a Macbook, and the monitor is hooked up via the HDMI/DVI adapter, but the resolution, even set at 720 on isn't nearly as good as before. Am I stuck with this or is there a way to get the external display looking as good as it did with PC?

A. 23" monitors are usually 1920X1080 not 720p (1280X720)
try setting it to 1920X1080.


Best PC monitor for £180?
Q. What is the best HD monitor i could get for £180?

A. HP 2310i 23" Widescreen LCD Monitor

http://www.pcworld.co.uk/gbuk/hp-2310i-23-widescreen-lcd-monitor-04277928-pdt.html

or

LG W2353V 23" Widescreen LCD Monitor
2 ms, DVI, HDMI, VGA

http://www.pcworld.co.uk/gbuk/lg-w2353v-23-widescreen-lcd-monitor-03864797-pdt.html





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Widescreen LCD monitor questions?

Q. People look fatter when I view them from my widescreen LCD monitor. Is there a way to make it look normal? Also, what is Hz? Mine is set to 75Hz. There's 60, 70, and 75. What's that?

Thanks!

A. The reason people look fatter is because your display adapter is in a non widescreen resolution.

The resolution of your display is specified in pixels width * height. Non widescreen monitors use a ration of 4:3 between width and height whereas widescreen monitors use a ratio of 16:9. When the wide screen monitor tries to display the 4:3 image it stretches it sideways to fit the 16:9 screen hence the people look fat.

Chances are your current display settings are 4:3 which will be someting like 1024x768 or 1280x960.

You can change this to a widescreen setting in Windows.

Right click on an unused area of your desktop and select properties from the pop up menu.

This will bring up the display properties panel, go to the settings panel and use the screen resolution slider to select a resolution where the ratio between width and height is 16:9 e.g 1280x1024 would be a good starting point .

Click the apply button then click OK in the dialog box which pops up on the screen.

The Hz setting is the refresh rate of the monitor, this is how many times it redraws the screen in a second. So 60 Hz = 60 refreshes per second while 70 Hz = 70 refreshes per second. Higher settings give less flicker, however you may find that it is fine at 60Hz.


LCD Monitors?
Q. Which is Better?

HP W2207 22" Widescreen Flat Panel LCD Monitor
Display
Screen size 22"
Widescreen Yes
Maximum resolution 1680 x 1050
Brightness 300cd/m2
Contrast ratio 1000:1
Response time 5-millisecond
Viewing angle width (degrees) Info unavailable
Audio
Speakers included Yes
General features
DVI (Digital Video Interface) 1
Warranty Parts 12 Months
Warranty Labor 12 Months
Dimensions
Height 19.0 inches
Width 20.6 inches
Depth 11.4 inches
Weight 19.8 lbs.

Samsung 226BW 22-Inch Digital/Analog Widescreen LCD Monitor (Black)
Screen size 22"
Widescreen Yes
Maximum resolution 1680 x 1050
Brightness 300cd/m2
Contrast ratio 3000:1
Response time 2-millisecond
Viewing angle width (degrees) 160 horizontal/vertical
Audio
Speakers included No
General features
DVI (Digital Video Interface) 1
Warranty Parts 36 Months
Warranty Labor 36 Months
Dimensions
Height 16.6 i

A. The samsung is better. When looking at LCD monitors, the higher contrast ratio and the faster response time are both important factors. Samsung also has a good reputation for video products.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Kamis, 24 April 2014

tv tuner for lcd monitor?

Q. where can i get a cheap tv tuner box example link :
http://www.compusa.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2707960&CatId=1427

i have a lcd computer screen laying around and i wanna turn it into a tv sience i dont use desktop pc anymore, please links to stores electronic stores or online websites for cheap but working tv tuner boxes with remote any help at all would be apreciated or if there is any other way to connect with out tuner box any tricks or connections any info welcomed

one problem my screen doesnt have speakers so the idea of dvd/vcr combo doesnt help becouse there is no way to connect speakers to it........

A. The best way is to just go out and get a DVD/VCR combo box. It has a tuner in it. You will also need a cable that goes from the S-video or VGA outputs on the back of the VCR to the monitor cable.

This is what I did, and I like it. Instead of just a tuner, I also have DVD/VCR capability.


External TV Tuner CRT Monitor?
Q. I'm aware on how to connect a standard VGA monitor to an external TV tuner - but I've only heard of it being done on LCD monitors - will a CRT monitor work as well. And will pictuer quality be and different than a CRT TV?
I specificaly said EXTERNAL TV TUNER - the PC is not in the equation
Ok here it is - straight out. I have a CRT flatscreen monitor with a cable to connect to a VGA input - I've seen external TV tuners with VGA inputs that you can connect directly to a cable line - thats what I plan on doing.

A. are you talking about a TV tuner on a PC. as in an internal card or USB adapter? what you would do in that situation is hook the monitor up to the computer and watch TV on it.
Please be more specific, give some details of your current or future configuration.

WELL external means it is connected to something. what you are talking about is a set top box.
if your device has a DVI or HDMI port then it is possible to connect that to a VGA connector. but if you only have S-video or RCA then you are going to have to find some wiring schematics cause yous gonna be soldering. the adapter from DVI to VGA would be the most economical and quick route to go. if you told me the model # and brand of the device you are hooking up i could give you are more definitive answer on how to do it.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Bought a new lcd monitor and the text looks wierd.?

Q. I just bought a brand new Samsung 21.5" 2233SW LCD Monitor?
and I have a Compaq Presario SR1130NX. The colors look amazing but the text doesnt look clear it... looks pretty fuzy and the black on wutever is on the screeen looks grayish. This is probably do to the fact that it recommends 1920x1080 resolution but my pc only goes up to 1280x1024 so it doesnt look very clear. Can someone tell me what type of video card i would need to achieve the resolution it should have to get the screen to work better?

Would this work: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4483694&SRCCODE=GOOGLEBASE&cm_mmc_o=VRqCjC7BBTkwCjCECjCE
would it be difficult to install (really no nothing about computer the make-up).

A. first check if your pc has pcie or agp that makes a difference. it should be in the manual or open the pc up and check an agp slot is usually brown or purple. you can view a pic of what it looks like online a check. or use gpuz a free program that will tell you.

if you have agp get a hd2600 512mb.

if pcie get a hd4670 or 4650 512mb or 1gb


15 inch LCD for text or 17 inch LCD Monitor?
Q.

A. Get a 17" or 19" you will find you can pick up a descent 19" for about £100.
If your using it to view text files you dont want any smaller than a 17" because it can be awkward to read on otherwise.

Also should you want it for other things a 19" would come in very useful should you use for other purposes.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Rabu, 23 April 2014

Using Monitor filter or change mine to LCD monitor could be better for my eyes?

Q. I'm sitting in front of the computer most of the day and still not using any filter to my CRT monitor.
What could be better to prevent my pain in eyes? Using a filter to the CRT or changing my monitor to LCD one?

A. You're still using a CRT?

If your CRT isn't capable of refresh rates at least above 76hz, then you should replace it.

LCD doesn't have that same refresh problem, so there won't be any flickering. It's mainly this flickering that causes eyestrain.

LCD also has a much brighter, crisper picture when sitting close, and isn't nearly as susceptible to glare because the outer screen of a LCD isn't made from glass, like CRT is.

If your eyes are still giving you problems and you wear glasses, many eyeglass places can make glasses that use a special coating that is supposed to help reduce eyestrain when using a computer.

Otherwise, every 15 minutes, you should look away from the screen and try focusing on an object that's far away (further than your arm's length at least) for a few seconds. This will help exercise your eye muscles and keep them from getting tired from just focusing at one length for so long.


Best Setup for 3 monitor display + TV mount (furniture, brackets, etc).?
Q. I am redoing my office/gaming/recording (YouTube) setup.

I need a desk, preferably L-Shape with room for 3 monitors and a tower PC as well as at least 1 laptop and some external HD's (the book-sized WD ones).

The desk needs to have space below for shelving that I can place my consoles on (xbox 1, ps4, ps3, etc) as well as an HDMI switch (minimal space) and some other wiring.

I am looking at Ergotech's Triple Horizontal LCD Monitor Arm Desk Stand and think it will do the job of holding my 3 24" monitors.

I would also like to mount a 32"-40" TV above the monitors on my wall (or on a stand if theres a 3 wide by 2 tall in the middle column bracket) so I can run cable/satellite and watch my shows while editing.

Any tips on designing this?

I need a desk first, and was thinking a corner one with the 3 monitors centered on the L bend (90* angle part) so I have room to the left for my laptop and to the right for my tower. As for the TV, not sure how to mount it onto the corner or how well that would work but am open to suggestions.

I prefer amazon for most of my buying, but will look at IKEA and other places as well.

A. For monitors, get 3 of these - amzn.to/1bFnH4h
Not sure about the desk, search ikea online.
The monitor holder you got there sounds good.
And I would get more that 1 desk If i was you, just so it helps space everything out, so maybe get an L shape, then get a small normal desk if you have room for it. So you could have the monitors, PC and laptop on the L shape desk (So the PC and monitors on the long part, then the laptop on the bottom of the L, which is hopefully the small part) then use another desk to put your Xbox and PS's on, and save up for another monitor.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Selasa, 22 April 2014

Getting an HD monitor for my games anything I should know?

Q. Alright finally going to look into getting a led back-light or a normal lcd monitor for my gaming pc felt like I wasting my hd video card with a basic gateway monitor. Well more correctly a friend asked me if I wanted one and which one

Anything I should avoid getting and anything I should look out for. Basically they will be getting it from mcriocenter and looking at something like this

http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0360134

I am not sure if such things are good for gaming or such have ati hd 5850 graphics card.

Sorry for any errors or typos. and thanks ahead of time.
So need one with hdmi or dvi?
Would something like this better apart form the built in speakers.

A. I have a samsung monitor myself (also a 24") and it's a great monitor. Samsung is a very good brand in my opinion.Reading expert reviews would always be a good thing, but you would have to find those. Try to find some user-experiances also.

One thing to think about is what to do if the monitor is defect like having dead pixels (often some dead pixels are called acceptable, but if i would see a visible dead pixel on my new monitor i'd be very disappointed) Luckily the 2 lcd-monitors i ever bought (a philips and a samsung) had no dead pixels whatsoever and were of exelent build quality. I stopped using the philips monitor because it was only a 3:4 19" but it's still working, and my samsung is already working for years without any problem. Bad luck can always strike though so it makes sense to way your options in advance, just in case there are visible dead pixels or other problems.

There are a lot of technical details you might want to pay attention to like viewing-angle (especially important if you plan not to sit straight for your monitor) , ghosting (probably non-existant in your monitor would be my guess), contrast-ratio (the strength of the picture in a bright room) powerconsumption (27 watt and 0.3 standby is pretty neat) etc. but since the samsung is about the cheapest 24" monitor on the site and it's a samsung with also some good specs, and is also led backlit monitor, my first impression is that it's a good choice.

The 24" size is a very nice size for on a desk. My monitor still uses the older 16:10 aspect ratio (samsung syncmaster T240) Your monitor might look a bit smaller because of it's (new) 16:9 aspect ratio. Of course you want a full HD monitor which this monitor is. For gaming you probly would use a bit lower resolution and if you are not a complete gaming-nerd that only wants the best of the best im pretty sure you won't be able to find anything wrong with the pictures it wil produce. Although 1920 x 1200 (this is a 16:10 resolution) is the maximum and also recommended resolution for my monitor i run windows in a 1280 x 800 resolution which gives nice big letters but also leaves a lot of space.

The site doesn't say what and how many inputs the monitor has. I think it has no hdmi connector though (a pitty i think, but not directly a reason not to buy the monitor), but it does have an dvi-d or dvdi-i (dual-link) connector (i can see the connector on the pic of the rear of the monitor, together with a d-sub connector, ) . This is strange because the specs on the samsung site only mention d-sub in (vga) and composite video (i think this is a mistake) in: http://www.samsung.com/us/computer/monitors/LS24A350HS/ZA-specs
I think though it's safe to asume there is a digital dvi in (would be pretty weird if there was no digital input at all) and that should be enough although an additional hdmi in (like on my monitor) would have been better. DVI-d or DVI-i can carry the hdmi signal but without sound .This may lead to some more cable-clutter and the need to buy a hdmi to dvi adapter, and maybe an adapter that splits audio from a hmdmi signal, for example.

The lack of a hdmi input may be a very big nuisance if you want to connect several hdmi-devices to your monitor because for instance if you'd have a hdmi tv-tuner with just hdmi out and want to hook it up to your monitor you can only hear the sound if you find an adapter that splits the sound from the signal. I think though that all connection problems are solvable but it would be a hell of a lot easier when there was a hdmi in. The reason for omitting hdmi in wil be the price i think and if you just use the monitor as a simple computer-monitor for a computer with dvi-out and not want to connect a lot of extra devices there should be no problem at all. However it might be worthwhile to look for a monitor with hdmi in and to think ahead very carefully on what connections you want to make especially relating to the fact that hdmi carries sound and dvi doesn't. My monitor for example does have hdmi-in and no speakers but audio out allowing me to hook up my own speakers to the monitor to hear the sound that comes through the hdmi cable. Again: in a simple setup using dvi might be no problem but the lack of hdmi-in can become awkward in some situations.

Notes: you can use the d-sub connector to connect a computer with dvi-i out (not dvi-d but most videocards have dvi-i) using a dvi-i to d-sub (vga) cable or adapter leaving the dvi connector to connect another device like a hdmi-device but without sound:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=244973&CatId=467
(vga may sound old but has about the same picture-quality as dvi or hdmi, especially over a short distance) Hdmi lends itself very wel for switching (using a switch box) and should be the preferred way of making your connections.


27 inch LCD monitor vs 24 inch LED LCD monitor ?
Q. im on a low budget, and cant pick one out, its for my xbox, and laptop

A. Go with the 27".

LED is overhyped. It'll often give you thinner monitors and slightly lower power consumption, but often gives lower maximum brightnesses than CCFL. And it will not give you better contrast in 99% of cases (unless it is true LED-backlit and not edgelit and has local dimming, which most don't).





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

how to install or guide for mount the LCD monitor?

Q. my monitor ACER X193HQ 18.5" plan to mount in a concrete wall..any help thnks..newbie for this prob..

A. Almost all LCD monitors have the four VESA mounting holes at the back.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Display_Mounting_Interface

Simple mounting hardware:
http://www.ozdirect.com/product_info.php?source=aushopping&utm_source=aushopping&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=aushopping&products_id=29558

More sophisticated mounts:
http://www.ergoindemand.com/lcd_wall_mounts.htm


i had seen this really cool lcd monitor hanged on a wall as if it were a projector?
Q. when did people start hanging their pc monitor on the wall?
is it some kind of new way of using the pc?
it looked pretty cool can i do it what kind of size is required for pleasant comfortable use?

A. Most PC monitors can be wall mounted, just like an LCD TV. You will need to buy an LCD wall mounting bracket and ensure the wall you are putting it on can take it, of course.

I did it as a handy way of freenig up desk space. he size depends on how far from your desk you want to hang it. I have mine on the wall immediately behind my desk so a standard 19" was fine, but if i was looking at it across a room I would want something larger. Remember that the bigger the screen the greater the resolution and therefore the better the gfx card yo will need.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Senin, 21 April 2014

does Refresh Rate really important when buying a lcd monitor of 23 or 24 inch for watching movies and games ?

Q. i wanna buy a LCD-monitor for my PC. i researched on a few things before buying. but I'm confused with refresh rate of LCD-moniters. some experts say that 85 Hz for 24-inch size is best and more than this it will not be a good thing but will result in a bad display. some say that 120 hz is new and best refresh rate for good picture clarity and for movies n video games.... :( what to do ?????

A. 60 Hz is good enough for an lcd-monitor because the picture is steady by nature, in contrast to tube-monitors that tend to flicker at lower refreshrates. 60Hz is a bit faster then the refreshrate of the human eye/brain, so you don't realy need anything faster. 60Hz also has as an extra advantage in games that it puts less load on the videocard, because the higher the refreshrate the more the videocard has to work, because 1 refresh-cycle consists among others of calculating the actuall content of the picture, so the less refresh-cycles in a given time-period, the more calculatingtime the videocard has left to for instance display a higher resolution or smoother video. What is important for lcd-monitors is a fast responsetime, a responsetime of 5ms or less is good.

oops now i gotta get a bit messy because this is new for me also:

Hmmmm, wel the higher refreshrates u mention are in fact not realy higher refreshrates but some new/unclear technique. (i just read it now, and it's new for me) of inserting black images to reset the eye. But anyway it seems that lcd tv's have a habit of not mentioning the responsetime (this is NOT the same as the refreshrate or responseRATE) while monitors do mention the responsetime. A good responsetime (grey to grey 5ms or less) is the most important thing. The higher refreshrates are an unclear technique to me so i'd rather have an lcd monitor with a low responsetime like 2ms then an lcd-tv with 480 Mhz with a worse or unspecified responsetime. Or to put it differently: a monitor with a 5 or even 2 ms response time wil give a very nice smooth picture. However the insertion of black images may make it even smoother, but i think that's marginal (when i look at a video on my 5ms monitor it just looks great)

hd-tv's seem to utilize a new technology that projects black images over the native refreshrate of the videosource like for instance 50Hz (tv) or 60Hz (computer). So lets refrase my statement. You should use a video-source of no more then 60Hz because more is a waist of resources. I also think high refreshrates is something for tv's rather then monitors, maybe because tv's have a lower responsetime.

I would prefer a monitor that just displays at 60Hz with a low responsetime above any lcd-tv unless it also gives the responsetime in ms. But for use as a tv, not as a computer-monitor a high refreshrate may also be good, but again the responsetime is more important as i see it.

Also artficially increased refreshrate may have some nasty side-effects (see sources)

So there's actually 3 thing's when it comes to refreshrate: the rate of the source (lets say your computer is set to work at 60Hz, the refreshrate of the monitor (normally 1:1 so also 60Hz, but for tv's artificially increased)

Since you want a monitor and not a tv, i'd go for a "normal" led-monitor displaying the source 1:1 and with a 2ms responsetime. movies wil look great guaranteed, but monitors are normally smaller then tv's so you wil have to sit close.

For a livingroom tv, i'd get a tv with a low responseTIME, and an artificially increased refreshrate/responseRATE may be usefull but also must be able to be deactivated because it can actually decrease the quality of a movie.


What is the Best Lcd Tv-PC Monitor,,, 22-24 inch and not more than $700 ,, thanks?
Q. what makes lcd monitor a good one ,,,
what should i look for when buying new lcd
Details please explain as much as you can
thanks alot in advance

A. Gateway which just got acquired by ACER makes a really Superb 24" LCD HD Monitor with analog component inputs, HDMI, DVI and VGA Inputs as well as Composite and S-Video Inputs. The only thing it doesn't have is an ATSC Tuner. It's a monitor not a HDTV but it's the closest thing to an HDTV you can get without the Tuner being built in.
I have a 24" one and a 19" one, theyre the previous models to the ones that are out now. (Mine is FPD2485W) List price is about $500, online you can get 'em for alot less. They also make a 30" one that can do 1600p resolution but it's $1699.

the 2 main specifications of an LCD display that you will see is Brightness (may be described as NITS) and contrast
(usually expressed as a ratio).
more recent displays will advertise a contrast ratio of "2000:1" or "3000:1" and big displays might even advertise "7000:1" (Samsung) or "15000:1" (Sharp)
but in those cases the contrast ratio is the result of Digital Signal Processing (DSP) and isn't a true contrast meaure like you'd get on a CRT-Tube display.

Generally speaking the higher the contrast ratio the better, the higher the brightness the better. Also, LCD's have a narrower viewing angle, that is to say that if you're too far off to one side or the other the picture gets crappy looking and this is common from brand to brand and sceen size is not relevant. Plasmas aren't as bad at that but use 2X the power as LCD.

Good Luck!





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

EYE PROTECTION FOR LCD MONITOR?

Q. I have a LG FLATTRON W1943C LCD monitor. I have irritatation in my eyes after staring in this monitor for a long time. I tried reducing intensity but it didnt helped.what kind of protective glasses should i wear to reduce risk of eye damage ?

A. Stop staring for a long time and you will be fine.

There are no glasses that will help that.

You just need to learn how to use it...look away from the monitor every few minutes, even just for a few seconds...look around the room...look outside...

Then after every hour...get up and walk around...give your eyes a break for 10 minutes or so.

Also place the monitor as far back as you can...like 28 to 30 inches.

I spend many hours every day on the computer and don't have any eye problems with those those simple rules...don't over do it...that's all


will a big LCD monitor damage eyes?
Q.

A. If you are referring to the wife's tail that computer screens ruin your eyes than no. Older computer monitors like CRT actually give off a magnetic field and pulsate 50 times a second. It can irritate your eyes after a while but I believe the people that live under high voltage power lines are in more danger. LCD works with a florescent light bulb behind the screen. It should not hurt your eyes.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What is the best monitor LCD for the computer of 22 inch ?

Q. what is the best monitor LCD of 22 inch for the computer

A. The Question is ...

Do you want great value for your money?With Quality..

I'll recomend "ViewSonic" cheaper in price but same Specs with the Branded ones..

But if your shopping with great deals in mind...

Try to look for "Samsung BW" series with 4MS response time...

NOTE: don't get "LG" LCD Monitors they really sucks...

Knowing one company that has "LG" LCD after having them for only 3 yrs slowly dieng one by one...

Not good for this Brand to invest your money...


Just giving you reason not to choose "LG"


LCD Monitor 19 to 22 inches for under $60?
Q. I'm looking for an LCD Monitor 19 to 22 inches for under $60

A. You would have to look for a great sale... perhaps on black friday or cyber monday. Even on newegg, the cheapest LCD monitor is $86 dollars and that's for an open box item.

eBay or Craigs list might have some cheap monitors, but you would have to be careful about functionality and age of the equipment. Depending on where you are, the local newspaper ads might have a few as well.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Minggu, 20 April 2014

How to chose the best LCD monitor for my eyes?

Q. What is the most important criterion and specifications in LCDs for the health and comfort of eyes..please suggest some modeles..

A. SAMSUNG MONITOR IS THE BEST LCD MONITOR ...AND HP IS ALSO BEST LCD MONITOR


what is the disadvantages of LCD monitor?
Q.

A. While LCD monitors have a lot of strengths, they still have weaknesses that might turn off potential buyers. However, it's our opinion that these disadvantages don't really detract from the benefits of using an LCD monitor.

* More expensive than CRTs. You pay for what you get; LCDs look good and are good for your eyes (see Advantages article).
* Dead pixels. When the electrical current to one or more pixels does not operate properly, one or more cells are permanently aligned, resulting in a dead pixel.
* Screen care and fragility. LCD monitors may be slim and sexy, but they're also more prone to damage and screen breakage.
* Native resolution. LCD monitors can only display information well at the resolution they were designed for. At any other resolution, image quality will suffer.
* Pixel response time. In videos and fast-paced video games, LCDs suffer from the ghosting effect.
* Viewing angles. Looking at an LCD monitor from an angle causes the image to look dimmer or even disappear completely.
* Colors. The color accuracy of an LCD monitor does not match that of a CRT monitor's.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers